Victory of the North - 1306 Words

22 March 2013 Victory of the North There are many causes that led to the victory of the North, as well as many effects that follow their victory. Three important causes that led to the victory of the North are economic growth, secession, and the election of President Abraham Lincoln. Three important effects that followed the victory of the Northern States in the American Civil War are emancipation, a new financial system, and political freedom. The Civil War of America has been discussed as the first modern war of the new industrial age. Army’s of such a large size had yet to meet head on, face to face in the battle field with weapons of such mass destruction and deadly force. America had not yet seen casualties of this magnitude to†¦show more content†¦They continued to adopt a constitution of their own. Then they chose Jefferson Davis from the state of Mississippi to be their president. The first effect of the North’s victory over the South is emancipation. Even though slaves were technically freed through â€Å"contraband†, Lincoln continued to persist that this fights intent is to save the Union, not to free the slaves. But, before eighteen sixty-two, Lincoln considered emancipation as being the next step necessary to win the war. On July twenty-second eighteen sixty-two, Lincoln unveiled a draft of the Emancipation Proclamation to his cabinet. It proposed emancipation of all slaves in rebel areas on January 1st, eighteen sixty-three. The Secretary of State William H. Seward agreed with Lincoln s initial draft, but he warned President Lincoln to wait till the Union had won a major victory before introducing the proclamation to the public. In eighteen sixty-two President Lincoln got his opportunity to do so, when the Union was victorious in the Battle of Antietam. On September twenty-second President Lincoln officially issued the Emancipation P roclamation to the public. The Proclamation warned the Confederate states that if they did not surrender by January first, eighteen sixty-three, their slaves would be freed. The second effect of the North’s victory over the South is a new financial system. The American Civil War destroyed theShow MoreRelatedWas Victory For The North Inevitable?2021 Words   |  9 PagesAbby Keating Was Victory for the North Inevitable? Often, when one feels as though they have a better chance at succeeding than their opponent, the odds will flip, and that person will find that what they thought would be an easy win takes much more of an effort. In the American Civil War, the North went into battle with this mindset, later realizing that in order to keep the Union alive, they would have to put forth much more exertion than initially suspected. The Civil War began as a result ofRead MoreVictory in the North: Us Civil War1003 Words   |  5 Pages| Victory in The North | A synopsis on the outcome of the U.S. Civil War | | [Type the author name] | 11/6/2010 | | Since the final battle of the American Civil War was fought in 1865, scholars have debated the reasons for the Union’s victory over the Confederacy. Historians have attributed the war’s outcome to many factors, some of which include Lincoln’s superior leadership, the South’s failure to diplomatically secure foreign intervention, emancipated slaves enlisting in theRead MoreAsses the Significance of the North African Campaign to the Allied Victory in the European War1095 Words   |  5 PagesConflict in Europe Asses the significance of the conflict in North Africa to allied victory in the European war. Allied victory in the North African campaign is significant for allied victory in the European war. The campaign provided the allies with major strategic and economic advantages, boosted British morale and proved Anglo-American cooperation to be successful. Additionally, conflict in North Africa also diverted substantial German and Italian resources that were needed elsewhere, thusRead MoreThe Roles of the Ho Chi Minh Trail for the Victory of the North in the Vietnam War809 Words   |  4 PagesVietnam War, in which the technologically superior US army lost to the inferior North Vietnamese Army (NVA). Prior to the Vietnam War, the French IndoChina War ended several years earlier, in which the Viet Minh forces managed to push out the French forces, separating the country into two; the Communist North lead by Ho Chi Minh, and the South led by a French-backed emperor. By then, the US government feared that the fall of North Vietnam to communism would cause neighboring countries in So utheast AsiaRead MoreAggression : The Export Of Violence927 Words   |  4 Pages This same aggression was on display during the American Civil War. Both the North and South were fighting for their version of democracy in the Civil War. Lincoln optimized this in his closing line of the Gettysburg Address, â€Å"that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.† Several battles for both sides added to the attrition efforts and almost achieved a decisive victory but fell short. America felt the effects of battles on the home front and theRead MoreA Pyrrhic Victory Is Defined, Per Merriam-Webster, As â€Å"A969 Words   |  4 Pagespyrrhic victory is defined, per Merriam-Webster, as â€Å"A victory that is not worth winning because so much is lost to achieve it.† For much of America in the era of the Vietnam War, the Tet Offensive could be defined as such a victory. In this paper I will first define the Tet Offensive in a co ncise manner, give the arguments supporting an American victory and the reciprocal considering a North Vietnamese victory, and finally make a conclusion supporting the thesis that in the long term, the North VietnameseRead MoreWho Won the Civil War Essay801 Words   |  4 Pagesare still being determined. This question is nebulous in the fact that certain aspects can be attributed to the South winning some aspects of the war and the North others. Also, do we include the impacts on former slaves as a Northern victory or do consider them to be their own side during this conflict. Many people will say that the North undoubtedly won the war, but the Souths social hierarchy did not really change that much after the war. The former slaves went on many times to work for theirRead MoreInsurgent Warfare : A New Form Of Conflict994 Words   |  4 PagesInsurgent warfare was not a new form of conflict to this part of the world however; the North Vietnamese communist government took it on e-step further to create almost an ideal insurgency in South Vietnam. An insurgency was developed and controlled from the Communist North Vietnamese government in Hanoi leading to both an unconventional and conventional conflict with the goal of unifying all of Vietnam. The North Vietnamese communist leadership exploited an immature and illegitimate South VietnameseRead MoreThe United States And South Vietnam Achieved During The Tet Offensive980 Words   |  4 PagesThe tactical victory that the United States and South Vietnam achieved during the Tet Offensive turned into a defeat because of how the media in America covered the events of the Tet Offensive. While, surprised during the early stages of the Tet Offensive the United States and South Vietnamese forces were able to regroup quickly and force the North Vietnamese back from the positions and cities that they had taken like Hue (Herring, 239). In the aftermath of the Tet Offensive, much of the news reportRead MoreThe North s Technological Advances939 Words   |  4 Pagesthe 13th amendment, banning slavery. The North were fighting for the freedom of slaves while on the other hand the South opposed this and fought to keep slavery legal. The North had many things the South hadn’t such as an abundance of factories, trains, and phone lines for the telegraph which the South happened to be lacking. Due to their technological advancements, the North was able to gain the upper hand and win the Civil War. First of all, the North had placed many railroad tracks while the